이달의 증례
| The Effects of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation on Right Ventricular Function | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 년도 | 2024년 4월 | ||
| 카테고리 | 이달의 kcj Hot Article | ||
| 저자 | Minkwan Kim, MD, PhD,1 Jae-Sun Uhm, MD, PhD,2 Je-Wook Park, MD,1 SungA Bae, MD, PhD,1 In Hyun Jung, MD, PhD,1 Seok-Jae Heo, PhD,3 Daehoon Kim, MD,2 Hee Tae Yu, MD, PhD,2 Tae-Hoon Kim, MD,2 Boyoung Joung, MD, PhD,2 and Moon-Hyoung Lee, MD, PhD2 | ||
| 소속 | 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.
2Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. |
||
| 첨부파일 1 | KCJ-23-312-GA.png | ||
- 관리자
- 등록일 : 2024.04.22
- Hit 529
Background and Objective
The effects of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) on right ventricular (RV) function are not well known.
Methods
Patients who underwent RFCA for AF and underwent pre- and post-procedural echocardiography were enrolled consecutively. Fractional area change (FAC), RV free-wall longitudinal strain (RVFWSL), and RV 4-chamber strain including the ventricular septum (RV4CSL) were measured. Changes in FAC, RVFWSL, and RV4CSL before and after RFCA were compared among paroxysmal AF (PAF), persistent AF (PeAF), and long-standing persistent AF (LSPeAF) groups.
Results
A total of 164 participants (74 PAF, 47 PeAF, and 43 LSPeAF; age, 60.8 ± 9.8 years; men, 74.4%) was enrolled. The patients with PeAF and LSPeAF had worse RV4CSL (p<0.001) and RVFWSL (p<0.001) than those with PAF and reference values. Improvements in RVFWSL and RV4CSL after RFCA were significant in the PeAF group compared with the PAF and LSPeAF groups (ΔRV4CSL, 8.4% [5.1, 11.6] in PeAF vs. 1.0% [−1.0, 4.1] in PAF, 1.9% [−0.2, 4.4] in LSPeAF, p<0.001; ΔRVFWSL, 9.0% [6.9, 11.5] in PeAF vs. 0.9% [−1.4, 4.9] in PAF, 1.0% [−1.0, 3.6] in LSPeAF, p<0.001). In patients without recurrence, improvements in RVFWSL and RV4CSL after RFCA were significant in the PeAF group compared to the LSPeAF group.
Conclusions
RV systolic function is more impaired in patients with PeAF and LSPeAF than in those with PAF. RV systolic function is more improved after RFCA in patients with PeAF than in those with PAF or LSPeAF.
본문 바로가기 : https://e-kcj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4070/kcj.2023.0312
댓글 0
댓글 쓰기
[댓글 목록]
- 학회소개
- 학술 행사
- 학회지(KCJ)
- 심장학
최신지견 따라잡기
- 진료지침
- 자료실
- 회원공간
- 공지사항